想要学英语的朋友想必都知道,如今的英语培训教学模式主要分为线上英语培训和线下英语培训两种。经过我的仔细对比和研究,我觉得线上外教一对一的这种教学模式更值得大家选择,这种教学模式的好处就在于随时随地都能学习,方便快捷,能自主规划学习时间;外教一对一辅导,能够塑造良好的语言环境,有利于口语学习;而且针对性强,可以针对薄弱环境进行针对性辅导,效果看得见。

       其实英语培训机构出名的也就这么几家,分别是阿卡索外教网,华尔街,美联,英孚等等, 说到线下华尔街,美联,英孚其特点是贵(没几万块搞不定),还是小班上课,而线上阿卡索相比线下是性价比高,一对一教学,方便学习,但是华尔街和英孚走的高端路线,一节课在100-200元左右,所以性价比没有前两家高。所以最后经过对比我选择了阿卡索外教网,全程支持无理由退款,性价比还是比较高的。

       而目前口碑最好,性价比最高的线上英语培训机构当属阿卡索外教网了。阿卡索外教网是由大明星佟大为代言的一家在线外教一对一的英语培训机构,以超高的性价比和良好的口碑,颇受大家的喜爱,在网上的名气也是很大。最关键的是他们那的价格收费平均一节课才20块钱左右,可以天天上课,高频学习,真正做到了天天在家留学,英语记忆更深刻,适合长期报名学习,扎实提高英语水平!。

      当初我也报的阿卡索,现在学的蛮不错的,这里分享一节阿卡索价值288元的免费试听课程:https://www.acadsoc.com.cn/

       1、花同样的钱在阿卡索可以每天都上一节课,在别的机构一周一节课,而且外教不好约, 孩子学了英语容易忘,阿卡索每天都可以学习英语效果更好。

       2、阿卡索外教老师都持有tesol证书(国际英语教师资格证书),有证的才是外教,没有证的是陪聊,现在外面很多机构都是黑外教。大家都说自己老师好,那怎么能信,所以有证才能信。现教育行业唯一承诺100%拥有TESOL证书高频次学习,才有效果。阿卡索外教优势没有机构能达到。

        3、孩子在别的机构学了一年多,效果到底怎样也不知道,阿卡索联合欧洲的英语学院,对孩子进行测评考试,因为花钱了学的怎样,有没有效果,考过了就知道。

点击链接领取少儿英语试听课程:https://www.acadsoc.com.cn/shaoer【零基础英语可学】

点击链接领取成人英语试听课程https://www.acadsoc.com.cn/chengren【外教一对一英语】

       阿卡索外教网课程有,成人英语、少儿英语、雅思托福、商务英语、职场英语、四六级英语等课程分类,一定有适合您自己的。阿卡索的教学课程质量我都体验过,教材以及学习效果都很好。

您的位置 首页 真题

2015年考研英语一阅读真题及答案解析完整版

2015年考研英语一阅读真题及答案解析完整版: 2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)试题 Section I Use of English  Direction…

2015年考研英语一阅读真题及答案解析完整版:

2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)试题

Section I Use of English 
Directions: 
Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or Don the ANSWER SHEET. (10points) 
Though not  biologically related, friends are  as  “related” as  fourth  cousms, sharing about 1 %  of genes. That is   1   a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has  2 The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted 3   1,932 unique subjects which 4   pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same  people were used in both_5_ While 1 %  may seem 6  ,    it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even 7 their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who 8  our kin.” The study_9_ found that the genes  for  smell  were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity. Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now.  10 as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there  1s more 11   it. There could be many mechanisms working together that  12    us in  choosing genetically similar friends _D “functional kinship” of being friends with  14 One of the remarkable findings of  the study was that the similar genes seem to be evolving 15   than other genes. Studying this could help 16   why human evolution picked pace  in  the last 30,000 years, with  social  environment being a major 17   factor. The findings do not simply explain people’s -18 to befriend those of similar 19 backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of  European extraction, care was taken  to 20 that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population . https://www.ienglishcn.com/

1.[A] when [B] why[C] how[D] what
2.[A] defended [B] concluded[C] withdrawn[D] advised
3. [A] for [B] with[C] on[D] by
4. [A] compared [B] sought[ C] separated[D] connected
5. [A] tests [B] objects[C] samples[D] examples
6. [A] insignificant [B] unexpected[C] unreliable[D] incredible
7. [A] visit [B] miss[C] seek[D] know
8. [A] resemble [B] influence[C] favor[D] surpass
9. [A] again [B] also[C] instead[D] thus
10. [A] Meanwhile [B] Furthermore[ C] Likewise[D]Perhaps
11. [A] about [B] to[C] from[D] like
12. [A] drive [B] observe[C] confuse[D] limit
13. [A] according to [B] rather than[C] regardless of [D] along with
14. [A] chances [B] responses[C] missions[D]benefits
15. [A] later [B] slower[C] faster[D] earlier
16. [A] forecast [B] remember[C] understand[D] express
17. [A] unpredictable [B] contributory[C] controllable [D] disruptive
18. [A] endeavor [B] decision[C] arrangement [D] tendency
19. [A] political [B] religious[C] ethnic[D] economic
20. [A] see [B] show[C] prove[D] tell

Section II Reading Comprehension 
Part A 
Directions: 
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points) 

Text 1 
King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted “kings don’t abdicate, they die in their sleep.” But embarrassing  scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the  Spanish crisis suggest that  monarchy is  seeing its  last  days? Does that mean the  writing is  on  the  wall for  all  European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyles? The  Spanish case provides arguments both for  and  against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was  following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above “mere” politics and “embody” a  spirit of national unity. It is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs’ continuing popularity as heads of state. And so, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican city and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in  the  Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure. Even so,  kings and queens undoubtedly have a  downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history – and sometimes the way they behave today – embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modem democratic states. The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not  horses ( or helicopters). Even so,  these are wealthy families who party with the international 1 %,  and media intrusiveness makes it  increasingly difficult to  maintain the right image. While Europe’s monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example. It is  only the  Queen who has  preserved the  monarchy’s reputation with her rather ordinary (if well-heeled) granny style. The  danger will come with Charles, who has  both an  expensive taste of lifestyle and  a  pretty hierarchical view of the world. He  has  failed to  understand that  monarchies have largely survived because they provide a  service -as  non-controversial and  non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not  republicans, who are the monarchy’s worst enemies.

21. According to the first two paragraphs, King Juan Carl of Spain[A] eased his relationship with his rivals.[B] used to enjoy high public support.[C] was unpopular among European royals.[D] ended his reign in embarrassment.
22. Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostly[A] to give voters more public figures to look up to.[B] to achieve a balance between tradition and reality.[C] owing to their undoubted and respectable status.[D] due to their everlasting political embodiment.
23. Which of the following is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4?[A] Aristocrats’ excessive reliance on inherited wealth.[B] The role  of the nobility in modem democracies.[C] The simple lifestyle  of the aristocratic families.[D] The nobility’s adherence to their privileges.
24. The British royals “have most  to fear” because Charles[A] fails to adapt himself to his future role.[B]fails to change his lifestyle as advised.[C]takes republicans as his potential allies.[D]takes a tough line on political issues.
25. Which of the following is the best  title of the text?[A]Carlos, Glory and Disgrace Combined[B]Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the Throne[C]Carlos, a Lesson for All European Monarchs[D]Charles, Slow to React to the Coming Threats

Text2 
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest. California has asked the justices to refrain from a  sweeping ruling, particularly one that upsets the  old  assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It  is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies. The court would be  recklessly modest if  it  followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants. They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smartphone – a   vast storehouse of digital information – is similar to, say, going through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the  Fourth Amendment when they go  through the  wallet or  pocketbook of an arrestee without a  warrant. But  exploring one’s smartphone is  more like entering his or her home. A smartphone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. www.ienglishcn.comThe development of “cloud computing”, meanwhile, has  made that exploration so much the easier. Americans should take steps to  protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a  right to  expect private documents to  remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches. As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line­drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly burdensome for authorities to obtain a  warrant to  search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and  they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while waiting for a warrant. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom. But the  justices should not  swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the  new personal domain of the  passenger car  then; they must sort  out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now . 

26. The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to[A] prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.[B] search for suspects’ mobile phones without a warrant.[C] check suspects’ phone contents without being authorized.[D] prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.
27. The author’s attitude toward California’s argument is one of[A] disapproval.[B] indifference.[C] tolerance.[D] cautiousness.
28. The author believes that exploring one’s phone contents is comparable to[A] going through one’s wallet.[B] handling one’s historical records.[C] scanning one’s correspondences.[D] getting into one’s residence.
29. In Paragraphs 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that[A] principles are hard to be clearly expressed.[B] the court is giving police less room for action.[C] phones are used to store sensitive information.[D] citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected.
30. Orin Kerr’s comparison is quoted to indicate that[A] the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.[B] principles of the Constitution should never be altered.[C] California’s argument violates principles of the Constitution.[D] new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution .

Text3 
The journal Science is  adding an  extra  round of statistical checks to  its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The  policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that  basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings. “Readers must have confidence in  the conclusions published in  our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors (SBoRE). Manuscripts will be  flagged up  for  additional  scrutiny by  the  journal’s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts. Asked whether any  particular papers had  impelled the  change, McNutt said: “The creation of the  ‘statistics board’ was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of  statistics and  data analysis in  scientific research and  is  part of Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.” Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a  member of the  SBoRE group, says he  expects the  board to  “play primarily an advisory role.” He  agreed to  join because he  “found the  foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a  lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a  larger group of publishing places that  may want to  model their approach after Science.” John Ioannidis, a  physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is  “a most welcome step forward” and “long overdue”. “Most journals are weak in statistical review, and  this  damages the  quality of what they publish. I think that, for  the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,” he says, but he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the  Journal of  the  American  Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review. Professional scientists are  expected to  know  how to  analyse data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in  published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, “engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the  process”. Vaux says that Science’s idea to  pass  some  papers to  statisticians “has  some  merit, but  a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‘the papers that need scrutiny’ in the first place”. 
31. It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that[A]Science intends to simplify its peer-review process.[B]journals are strengthening their statistical checks.[C] few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.[D] lack of data analysis is common in research projects.32.The phrase “flagged up” (Para. 2) is the closest in meaning to[A] found.[B] revised.[C] marked.[D] stored.33.Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoREmay[A] pose a threat to all its peers.[B] meet with strong opposition.[C] increase Science’s circulation.[D] set an example for other journals.34. David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now[A] adds to researchers’ workload.[B] diminishes the role of reviewers.[C] has room for further improvement.[D] is to fail in the foreseeable future.35.Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A]Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in Papers[B] Professional Statisticians Deserve More Respect[C] Data Analysis Finds Its Way onto Editors’ Desks[D]Statisticians Are Coming Back with Science英语(一)试题 . 8 . (共 14 页)
Text4 Two years ago, Rupert Murdoch’s daughter, Elisabeth, spoke of  the “unsettling dearth of integrity across so  many of our  institutions”. Integrity had collapsed, she  argued, because of a  collective acceptance that  the  only “sorting mechanism” in society should be profit and the market. But “it’s us, human beings, we the people who create the society we want, not profit.” Driving her  point  home, she  continued: “It’s increasingly apparent that  the absence of purpose, of a  moral language within government, media or  business could become one of the most dangerous goals for capitalism and  freedom.” This same absence of  moral purpose was wounding companies such as  News International, she thought, making it more likely that it  would lose its  way as it had with widespread illegal telephone hacking. As the hacking trial concludes – finding guilty one ex-editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, for conspiring to hack phones, and finding his predecessor, Rebekah Brooks, innocent of the same charge – the wider issue of dearth of integrity still stands. Journalists are known to have hacked the phones of up to 5,500 people. This is hacking on an industrial scale, as was acknowledged by Glenn Mulcaire, the man hired by the News of the  World in 2001 to be the  point person for phone hacking. Others await trial. This long story still unfolds. In many respects, the dearth of moral purpose frames not only the fact of such widespread phone hacking but the terms on which the trial took place. One of the astonishing revelations was how little Rebekah Brooks knew of  what went on in her  newsroom, how little she  thought to ask and  the  fact that she never inquired how the  stories arrived. The core of her  successful defence was that  she  knew nothing. In today’s world, it has become normal that well-paid executives should not be accountable for  what happens in  the  organisations that  they run. Perhaps we should not be so surprised. For a generation, the collective doctrine has been that the sorting mechanism of society should be profit. The words that have mattered are  efficiency, flexibility, shareholder value, business-friendly, wealth generation, sales, impact and, in newspapers, circulation. Words degraded to the margin have been justice, fairness, tolerance, proportionality and accountability. The purpose of editing the News  of the  World was not  to  promote reader understanding, to be fair in what was written or to betray any common humanity. It was to ruin lives in the quest for circulation and impact. Ms Brooks may or may not have had suspicions about how her journalists got their stories, but she asked no questions, gave no instructions – nor received traceable, recorded answers . 
36. According to the first two paragraphs, Elisabeth was upset by[A] the consequences of the current sorting mechanism.[B] companies’ financial loss due to immoral practices.[C] governmental ineffectiveness on moral issues.[D] the wide misuse of integrity among institutions.
37. It can be inferred from Paragraph 3 that [A] Glenn Mulcaire may deny phone hacking as a crime.[B] more journalists may be found guilty of phone hacking.[ C] Andy Coulson should be held innocent of the charge.[D] phone hacking will be accepted on certain occasions.
38. The author believes that Rebekah Brooks’s defence[A] was hardly convincing.[B] centered on trivial issues.[C] revealed a cunning personality.[D] was part of a conspiracy.
39. The author holds that the current collective doctrine shows[A]a marginalized lifestyle.[B] unfair wealth distribution.[C]generally distorted values.[D]a rigid moral code.
40. Which of the following is suggested in the last paragraph?[A]The quality of writings is of primary importance.[B] Moral awareness matters in editing a newspaper.[C]Common humanity is central to news reporting.[D]Journalists need stricter industrial regulations .

PartB 
Directions: 
In  the  following text, some sentences have been removed. For  Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one  from the list A-G to  fit into  each of the numbered blanks. There are two extra choices, which do not fit in any of the blanks. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (lOpoints) How does your reading proceed? Clearly you  try  to  comprehend, in  the sense of  identifying meanings for individual words and working out relationships between them, drawing on  your implicit  knowledge of  English grammar. (41) _______________ You begin to  infer a context for the text, for instance by making decisions about what kind of speech event is involved: Who is making the utterance, to whom, when and where. The ways of reading indicated here are without doubt kinds of comprehension. But  they show  comprehension to  consist not  just  of passive assimilation  but  of active  engagement in inference and problem-solving. You infer information you feel the writer has invited you to grasp by  presenting you with specific evidence and clues. (42) _____________ _ Conceived in this way, comprehension will not follow exactly the same track for each  reader. What is  in question is not  the retrieval of an absolute, fixed or “true” meaning  that  can  be read off and checked for accuracy, or some timeless relation of the text to the world. (43) ______________ _ Such background material inevitably reflects who we are. (44) _____ _ This doesn’t, however, make interpretation  merely relative or even pointless. Precisely because readers from different historical periods, places and social experiences produce different but overlapping readings of the same words on the page -including for texts that engage with fundamental human concerns -debates about texts can play an important role in social discussion of beliefs and values. How we read a given text also depends to some  extent  on our particular interest in reading it. ( 45) _______________ Such  dimensions of reading suggest  -as others introduced later in the book will also do  –  that we bring an implicit  (   often unacknowledged) agenda to any act of reading. It doesn’t then necessarily follow that one kind of reading is fuller, more advanced or more worthwhile than another. Ideally, different kinds of reading inform each other, and act as useful reference  points for and counterbalances to  one another. Together, they make up  the reading  component  of your overall literacy, or  relationship  to your surrounding textual environment. 

[A]  Are we  studying that  text and  trying to  respond in  a  way that fulfils therequirement of a given course? Reading it simply for  pleasure? Skimming itfor  information? Ways of reading on  a  train or  in  bed  are  likely to  differconsiderably from reading in a seminar room.
[BJ  Factors such as  the  place and  period in  which we  are  reading, our  gender, ethnicity, age and social class will encourage us towards certain interpretations but at the same time obscure or even close off others. 
[C]If you are unfamiliar with words or idioms, you guess at their meaning, using clues presented in  the  context. On  the  assumption that they will become relevant later, you make a mental note of discourse entities as well as possible links between them. 
[D]  In effect, you try to reconstruct the likely meanings or effects that any given sentence, image or  reference might have had: These might be  the  ones the author intended. 
[EJ  You make further inferences, for  instance, about how the  text may be significant to  you, or about its  validity – inferences that form the basis of a personal response for which the author will inevitably be far less responsible. 
[F] In plays, novels and narrative poems, characters speak as constructs created by the author, not necessarily as mouthpieces for the author’s own thoughts. 
[GJ  Rather, we ascribe meanings to texts on the basis of interaction between what we might call textual and contextual material: between kinds of  organization or  patterning we  perceive in  a  text’s formal structures (so  especially its language structures) and  various kinds of background, social knowledge, belief and attitude that we bring to the text. 

PartC 
Directions: 
Read the  following text carefully and then translate the  underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points) 
Within the  span of a  hundred years, in  the  seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, a tide of emigration one of the great folk wanderings of history swept from Europe to  America. ( 46)  This movement, driven by  powerful and diverse motivations, built a nation out of  a wilderness and, by its nature, shaped the character and destiny of an uncharted continent. (47)The United States is  the  product of  two principal forces –  theimmigration of European peoples with their varied ideas, customs, and  national characteristics and  the  impact of a  new country which modified these traits. Of necessity, colonial America was a projection of Europe. Across the Atlantic came successive groups of Englishmen, Frenchmen, Germans, Scots, Irishmen, Dutchmen, Swedes, and many others who attempted to transplant their habits and traditions to the new world. ( 48) But the force of geographic conditions peculiar to America, the interplay of the varied national groups upon one another, and the sheer difficulty of maintaining old-world ways in a raw, new continent caused significant changes. These changes were gradual and at first scarcely visible. But the result was a new social pattern which, although it resembled European society in many ways, had a character that was distinctly American. ( 49) The first shiploads of immigrants bound for the  territory which is now theUnited States crossed the Atlantic more than a  hundred years after the l 5th-and-16th-century explorations of North America. In  the  meantime, thriving Spanish colonies had been established in Mexico, the West Indies, and South America. These travelers to  North America came in  small, unmercifully overcrowded craft. During their six- to twelve-week voyage, they survived on barely enough food allotted to them. Many of the ships were lost in  storms, many passengers died of disease, and infants rarely survived the journey. Sometimes storms blew the vessels far off their course, and often calm brought unbearably long delay. To  the  anxious  travelers the  sight of  the  American  shore  brought almost inexpressible relief. Said one recorder of  events, “The air  at  twelve leagues’ distance smelt as sweet as a new-blown garden.” The  colonists’ first glimpse of the new land was a sight of dense woods. www.ienglishcn.com(50) The virgin forest with its richness and variety of trees was a real treasure-house which extended from Maine all the way down to  Georgia. Here was abundant fuel and  lumber. Here was the  raw material of houses and furniture, ships and potash, dyes and naval stores . 

Section III  Writing 
PartA 
51.Directions:
You are going to host a club reading session. Write an email of about 100words recommending a book to the club members. 
You should state reasons for your recommendation. 
You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET. 
Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter, use “Li Ming ” instead. 
Do not write the address. (10 points) 

PartB 
52.Directions:
Write an   essay of 160-200 words based on the following picture. In your essay,you should 
1) describe the picture briefly,
2)interpret its intended meaning, and

3)give your comments.You should write neatly on ANSWER SHEET. (20 points)

2015年考研英语一阅读真题及答案解析完整版

2015年考研英语手机聚餐

2.罗列关键词
①dis h [n.]菜;②seat[ v . J坐;③playwith phones玩手机;④smartphone智能手机;(face- to-face communication面对面交流
3.行文思路
第一段:描述图片;
第二段:分析图片反映的问题;
第三段:总结前文,并提出建

2015年考研英语一阅读真题及答案解析完整版

2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题参考答案

Section I: Use of English (10 points) 
1 – 5: D-B-C-A-C 
6 – 10: A-D-A-B-D 
11-15: B-A-B-D-C 
16-20: C-B-D-C-A 
Section II: Reading Comprehension (60 points) Part A (40 points) 
21 – 25 :  D-C-B-A-C
26–30: C-A-D-D-D
31–35:   B-C-D-C-A 
36 –40:   A-B-A-C-B
Part B (10 points) 
41 – 45 : C-E-G-B-A 
Part C (10 points) 
46.在多种强大的动机驱动下,这次运动在一片荒野上建起了一个国家;本质使然,它也塑了一个未知大陆的性格和命运。
47.美国是两种主要力量的产物–欧洲移民所带来的各式思想、习俗及民族特色和这个新国家融合上述特征所带来的影响。
48.但是,美国特有的地理条件,不同民族的相互影响,以及在这片原始的新大陆上维持旧秩序的艰难,引起了重大变化。
49.在15-16世纪发现美洲大陆的一百多年之后,第一艘满载移民的航船跨过了大西洋驶向这片土地,即现在的美国。50.拥有丰富多样树种的原始森林是一个真正的宝库,它从缅因州一直延伸到乔治亚州。

以上是爱英语网【www.iEnglishcn.com】小编整理的内容,希望对你有帮助,喜欢的话,欢迎点赞和分享哦~

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系站长微信:153055113,我们会及时删除处理。
广告位

作者: liuqing

本站可在线投稿英语及相关文章,也可以租售目录,文章需符合法律法规,详情联系站长微信:153055113

为您推荐

2018年6月大学英语四级考试阅读真题第三套听力及答案

2018年6月大学英语四级考试阅读真题第三套听力及答案

2018年6月大学英语四级考试阅读真题第三套听力及答案 2018年6月大学英语四级考试阅读真题写作: Part I Wr...
2018年6月大学英语四级考试真题第二套听力音频及答案

2018年6月大学英语四级考试真题第二套听力音频及答案

2018年6月大学英语四级考试真题第二套听力音频及答案: 2018年6月大学英语四级考试真题写作第二套: Part I ...
2018年6月大学英语四级考试真题第一套听力及答案解析

2018年6月大学英语四级考试真题第一套听力及答案解析

2018年6月大学英语四级考试真题第一套听力及答案解析 2018年6月大学英语四级考试真题第一套: Part I Wri...
2017年12月大学英语四级考试真题卷第三套及答案解析

2017年12月大学英语四级考试真题卷第三套及答案解析

2017年12月大学英语四级考试真题卷第三套及答案解析 2017年12月大学英语四级考试真题卷写作第三套: Part I...
2017年12月大学英语四级考试真题卷第二套听力及答案

2017年12月大学英语四级考试真题卷第二套听力及答案

2017年12月大学英语四级考试真题卷第二套听力及答案 2017年12月大学英语四级考试真题写作第二套: Part I ...

发表评论

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

返回顶部